Over the past few months, computer parts have rapidly increased in price, making it incredibly costly for people wanting to build their own desktop PCs, let alone upgrade certain parts in their old computers. One of the pieces of hardware that have been hit the hardest is RAM, or Random-Access Memory, which is a core component that is needed in a computer since it works as the computer’s fast, temporary workspace for data and programs currently in use, allowing the processor (or CPU) to access them quickly. Without RAM in your computer, it wouldn’t be able to function, and it is a necessary part for computers to use.

NVIDIA, Google, and many other AI-based companies have begun purchasing a large majority of RAM for their AI systems, leaving little supply for the average consumer. AI is very demanding, and these companies are constantly competing with each other, wanting to have the most powerful AI. This has caused a major price influx with RAM, leading to consumers having to pay (on average) 50% more than prices from early 2025. This has caused a lot of outrage among consumers who want to build a PC or buy new parts for their PCs.
If this continues and the RAM shortages get worse or don’t improve, this could affect interest in technology and people’s ability to use computers and other electronics. Despite AI’s capabilities and uses in our daily lives, let’s prioritize consumers over companies, since this limits people’s chances of entering the technology field. I also think other companies may start making RAM sticks and offer an alternative brand for consumers to use, since the market for RAM is now much more open due to its limited supply. This could then lower RAM prices and create new options for consumers to purchase from.

Overall, I think RAM prices will eventually go back down, but they will never go back to their original price from early 2025. The pricing of RAM has already greatly affected people, and many consumers cannot even purchase RAM without blowing hundreds or even thousands, depending on the type and size. Innovation shouldn’t have to harm consumer accessibility; instead, it should be balanced between both.